NTSB Factual Report

HISTORY OF FLIGHT

On December 30, 2010, at 0958 central standard time, a Piper PA-46-310P, N9103N, collided with the terrain in Milaca, Minnesota, after the pilot reported the autopilot was no longer functioning and he was trying to recover from an unusual attitude. The private pilot, passenger, and a dog on board were fatally injured. The airplane was substantially damaged. The 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight was operating in instrument meteorological conditions. The pilot had filed and activated an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan. The flight departed from the Aitkin Municipal Airport (AIT), Aitkin, Minnesota, about 0930, and was en route to the Beaumont Municipal Airport (BMT), Beaumont, Texas.

The pilot contacted the Minneapolis Air Route Traffic Control Center at 0928 requesting an IFR clearance to BMT. The pilot was cleared direct to BMT and given an initial departure altitude of 5,000 feet. Five minutes later, the pilot reported to air traffic control that he was passing through 2,200 feet climbing to 5,000 feet. The pilot was instructed to climb and maintain 8,000 feet. The pilot acknowledged the clearance and at this time radar showed the airplane was about eight miles south of AIT. The pilot was then issued a frequency change.

The pilot checked-in on the new frequency reporting he was at 4,000 feet climbing to 8,000 feet. The air traffic controller instructed the pilot to climb and maintain 22,000 feet (flight level [FL] 220). The pilot acknowledged this clearance. At 0950, the controller instructed the pilot to maintain 17,000 feet. Once again, the pilot acknowledged this instruction. According to radar data, at 0950:44, upon reaching 16,800 feet, the airplane entered a descending right turn. The airplane completed a 360 degree right turn followed by a 360 degree left turn. Approximately two minutes later, the controller instructed the pilot to climb and maintain FL190. The pilot responded, “I lost my autopilot I’m in an unusual attitude.” When the controller asked the pilot to repeat what he had said, the pilot replied, “I’ve lost my autopilot and in an unusual attitude.” The controller stated to the pilot that he did not understand what he had said, and again the pilot replied that he had “lost” the autopilot and he was trying to recover from an unusual attitude. Approximately one minute later, the controller asked the pilot if he needed assistance. The pilot replied that he was busy trying to recover the airplane. This was the last transmission from the pilot.

The last radar data containing mode C altitude information was recorded at 0951:24. At this time the airplane was in a left turn and the altitude was reported as 16,000 feet. The last radar contact with the airplane was at 0955. The location of this radar data was nearly over the accident site.

There were no eye witnesses to the accident. Ear witnesses reported hearing the airplane overhead and the engine sounds varying. One witness, who holds a pilot certificate, stated he first heard the airplane engine "winding up which I assumed it was in a spiral." He stated it then sounded as if the pilot got out of the spiral and the airplane was coasting as it traveled north. He stated he heard the airplane travel back over his house with the engine sounding as if the throttle was still pulled back. He believed the airplane then turned and headed back north as he did not hear any engine sounds for a minute or two. He then heard the airplane heading back to the south, southeast toward his house. He stated he could hear the engine running, but it sounded like it was at idle. He then heard the engine sounds “wind up” and he thought the airplane was in a spiral. He did not hear an impact, but the engine sounds eventually ceased. The witness contacted the local authorities and went looking for the airplane which he located in a field near his residence.

PERSONNEL INFORMATION

The pilot, age 65, held a private pilot certificate with airplane single-engine land, instrument airplane, and glider ratings. He held a third-class airman medical certificate issued June 9, 2009. The medical certificate contained a limitation that the pilot must wear corrective lenses. The pilot reported having 2,000 hours of flight time on the application for the medical certificate.

The pilot’s family provided two pilot logbooks for review. The first logbook contained entries between August 5, 1997, and August 13, 2005. The flight time logged in this book totaled 949 hours, of which 34 hours were in the accident airplane. The second log book contained entries which totaled about 45 hours of flight time, of which approximately 43 hours were in the accident airplane. It could not be determined in what year some of the flights were flown.

An aircraft flight log page was found in the wreckage. The log contained flights for the accident airplane dated between May 1, 2009, and December 30, 2010. The second to last flight on the log was dated August 12, 2010. The date, departure airport, and destination airport of the last entry matched the accident flight. The flight times on this log totaled 90.5 hours, not including the accident flight.

The pilot’s last flight review and instrument proficiency check were conducted on October 2, 2009. The instructor who provided the flight review and instrument proficiency check stated that he provided flight training for the pilot in 2007, 2008, and on October 2, 2009. He stated that the pilot had training scheduled with him in October 2010. The pilot called him about a week before the training stating he had to cancel because he had a landing mishap in the airplane and it was being repaired. The pilot told him he was going to call and reschedule when the airplane was repaired, but the instructor never heard back from the pilot.

The instructor stated that most PA-46 pilots fly using the autopilot and that the accident pilot was no exception. He stated that during the training he provides, he has pilots hand-fly the airplane. Although not documented in the pilot’s records, the instructor stated that unusual attitude recovery is typically a part of the flight training he provides. He described the accident pilot as being an average to below average pilot compared to other pilots that he trains.

Federal Aviation Regulations, 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 61, state that in order to act as pilot in command under IFR a pilot must perform and log at least six instrument approaches, holding procedures and tasks, and intercepting and tracking courses through the use of navigational electronic systems within the preceding six calendar months. The pilot’s logbook did not indicate that he met this requirement.

AIRCRAFT INFORMATION

The six-seat, low-wing, pressurized, retractable-gear airplane, serial number 4608021, was manufactured in 1986. The airplane was registered to a company which was owned by the pilot. The airplane was powered by a Continental TSIO-550-C(1) engine, serial number 814578R. The engine and propeller, a Hartzell PHC-G3YF-1E/7890K were installed on the airplane in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate number SA01770CH.

Based on the hobbs meter, legible records, and the aircraft flight log, the aircraft total time at the time of the accident was estimated to be 2,465.5 hours. The hobbs time at the time of the accident was 727.5 hours. A review of the maintenance records revealed the last aircraft annual inspection was completed on March 15, 2010, at a total aircraft time of 2,438.7 hours. The last maintenance recorded for the airplane was dated September 13, 2010, at a hobbs time of 726 hours. The last static altimeter transponder certification inspection was performed on February 2, 2010.

The zero-time factory rebuilt engine was installed in the airplane on March 15, 2006, at a total aircraft time of 1,778.2 hours. According to the engine logbook, the last inspection performed was a 100 hour inspection completed on March 15, 2010, at an engine time in service of 660.5 hours.

The airplane was equipped with an ice protection system. Section 10 of the Pilot’s Operating Handbook stated: “The ice protection system was designed and tested for operation in the meteorological conditions of FAR 25, Appendix C, for continuous maximum and intermittent maximum icing conditions. The ice protection system was not designed or tested for flight in freezing rain and/or mixed conditions or for icing conditions more severe than those of FAR 25, Appendix C. Therefore, flight in those conditions may exceed the capabilities of the ice protection system.”

The airplane was equipped with a King KFC-150 series automatic flight control system providing pitch and roll control. Both the left and right control yokes contain elevator trim and autopilot disconnect buttons. According to the aircraft logbooks and maintenance records, the pitch trim servo was removed, repaired, and reinstalled on March 11, 2008. A factory overhauled pitch trim servo, serial number 46974 was installed on October 9, 2008. The pitch and trim servos were removed and reinstalled after repair during an annual inspection on February 19, 2009. On March 20, 2009, the trim servo was removed and replaced. A work order and email obtained from a repair station indicated that the autopilot would not pass the self test mode when turned on. The pitch servo was bench tested and no discrepancies were found. The pitch trim servo was replaced with a factory overhauled unit.

METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION

At 0734, the pilot contacted flight service for a weather briefing and to file a flight plan for the trip to BMT. The pilot was informed that there was a Minneapolis Center Watch, valid until 0910. The watch called for areas of low ceilings from 100 to 500 feet and visibility from 1/8 to 4 miles with mist, fog, drizzle, rain, and snow. The briefer informed the pilot that his altitude was going to put him on the border of an area of moderate turbulence from flight level (FL) 220 up through FL380. The briefer stated that there was an area of moderate ice below 6,000 north of a line running from the northeast corner of the stated to the southwest corner. The pilot filed a flight plan stating the airplane had 6 hours and 30 minutes of fuel on board.

A review of the recorded surface observation weather data from the Princeton Municipal Airport (PNM), Princeton, Minnesota, located about 17 miles south-southeast of the accident site, revealed the conditions at 0955 were wind from 070 degrees at 7 knots; visibility 1 3/4 miles with moderate rain; ceiling broken at 300 above ground level (agl), overcast at 1,600 agl; temperature 2 degrees Celsius; dewpoint 1 degree Celsius; and altimeter setting 29.42 inches of mercury.

A review of the recorded surface observation weather data from the Mora Municipal Airport (JMR), Mora, Minnesota, located about 19 miles east of the accident site, revealed the conditions at 0958 were wind from 080 degrees at 5 knots; visibility 1 mile with light rain; ceiling overcast at 200 agl; temperature 1 degree Celsius; dewpoint 0 degree Celsius; and altimeter setting 29.47

inches of mercury.

Weather data received from a weather balloon which was launched at 0600 from Chanhassen, Minnesota, located 79 miles southeast of the accident site indicated the freezing level was about 5,100 feet with temperature inversions at 2,500, 8,000, 11,500 and 18,000 feet. The majority of the troposphere was stable, with a layer identified as conditionally-unstable between 12,000 and 16,000. The vertical wind profile indicated light surface wind shifted clockwise to the southwest and increased to 50 knots about FL 230. Calculations of clear air turbulence made by the Universal RAwinsonde Observation (RAOB) program indicate layers of potential moderate to extreme turbulence from the surface through FL 230. Icing calculations made by RAOB, indicated a light clear and rime ice potential in a small layer between 5,000 and 7,000 feet, as well as a light rime ice potential between 14,000 and FL260.

Geostationary satellite data indicate that the cloud tops in the area of the accident site were about FL300.

An AIRMET for moderate icing below 16,000 feet was issued at 0845 and was active for the accident location.

WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION

The airplane came to rest in an open field that was surrounded by a wooded area. The field elevation at the site was 1,183 feet. There was a series of three main impact marks which were connected to each other. The heading from these impact marks to the main wreckage was 245 degrees. The distance from the initial impact to the main wreckage was about 360 feet. The first impact mark contained green glass and a navigational light housing. The nose gear was located near the second main impact mark and the left main landing gear was located between the third impact mark and the main wreckage.

The airplane came to rest on a heading of 158 degrees. The fuselage came to rest in an upright position with the left wing and empennage partially attached. The top of the cabin was cut by first responders so the occupants could be removed from the airplane. The dog was found outside the airplane and it was not determined where the dog was located during the flight. The fuselage sustained impact damage. The nose of the airplane was bent downward at the firewall. The bottom surface of the fuselage was crushed upward. The bottom of the fuselage between the middle and aft seats was crushed upward and partially separated.

The aft fuselage/tailcone was partially separated from the fuselage. The vertical stabilizer, rudder, left horizontal stabilizer, and left elevator remained attached to the tailcone. The right horizontal stabilizer and elevator were partially attached to the empennage and folded under to the left side of the empennage. The rudder control stops were in place with no preimpact damage noted. The elevator trim jack screw indicated the airplane was in a slight nose-up trim condition.

The left wing sustained impact damage primarily along the outboard leading edge of the wing. The wing remained attached to the fuselage. The flap was attached to the wing. The aileron remained attached to the wing at the inboard attach point.

The right wing separated from the fuselage at the wing root. The wing was located along the left side of the main wreckage. The right wing landing gear was extended. The outboard 2/3 (about 7 feet) of the wing was bent upward about 70 degrees. The flap remained attached to the wing at the outboard attach point. The aileron was attached at the inboard attach point. The wing sustained impact damage along the leading edge.

All of the flight control surface balance weights were in place. Control cable continuity was established from the cockpit controls to the control surfaces with all cable separations exhibiting broomstraw characteristics typical of overload separations.

One propeller blade was split and shattered. Another blade was broken off near the propeller hub. The third propeller blade was intact with minor impact damage.

The throttle and propeller controls were found mid-range. The mixture control was found in the full rich position. The landing gear handle was in the down position and the flap handle was in the up position.

An examination of the engine revealed continuity throughout the engine. Compression was received on all cylinders when the crankshaft was turned by hand. A spark was received on all of the leads for each magneto when the magneto shafts were turned using an electric drill. The spark plugs were dark in color and all exhibited normal wear. Oil was present throughout the engine. The inside of the cylinders were viewed with a boroscope and no anomalies were noted which would have resulted in a loss of engine power.

Both turbochargers sustained impact damage. Vegetation and dirt were impacted in the compressor section. Scoring was visible around the shrouds for the turbine and compressor blades on both turbochargers.

An examination of the fuel pump, injector nozzles, fuel control, oil filter, propeller governor, and vacuum pumps did not reveal any anomalies. Examination of the engine did not reveal any

NTSB Probable Cause

The pilot did not recover from an unusual attitude while operating in instrument meteorological conditions following a disconnect of the autopilot system for undetermined reasons. Contributing to the accident were the pilot’s lack of recent flight experience and impairment due to diphenhydramine.